Skip to content

shannonlowder.com

Menu
  • About
  • Biml Interrogator Demo
  • Latest Posts
Menu

SQL 101 – SELECT, Filtering Results (Part 2)

Posted on August 10, 2005February 9, 2011 by slowder

In the previous post, I covered the WHERE clause.  You should now feel pretty comfortable limiting the number of rows you get to return based on the values in a column.  But I’m sure you’ve already asked “How can I limit based on two different columns?”  I’m glad you asked!

You can chain together your WHERE clause predicates by using AND or OR.  If you’ve had any programming experience before you should be pretty familiar with these two.  If you choose AND, then both criteria have to be true.  If you choose OR, then only one has to be true.

Ok, let’s look at my Person.Contact table again, I want to look at all the Skywalkers in that table.

SELECT 
     FirstName, LastName
FROM person.Contact
WHERE
     LastName = 'Skywalker'

OUTPUT

FirstName  LastName
---------  ---------
Luke       Skywalker
Marvin     Skywalker
Michael    Skywalker

 

Looks like I have 81 Skywalkers in my Person.Contact table. Who knew, they were so prolific? Anyway, the problem with getting all 81, is I only wanted to look at Luke’s record.   Since we know the FirstName and the LastName, we can combine them into one WHERE clause using the AND operator.

The AND operator

SELECT 
     FirstName, LastName
FROM person.Contact
WHERE
     LastName = 'Skywalker'
     AND FirstName = 'Luke'

OUTPUT

FirstName  LastName
---------  ---------
Luke       Skywalker

Now we can see the one record we want.  You can chain together as many criteria as you need with the AND clause.

The OR Operator

Like I was saying before, when you use the OR operator, if either of your two tests are true, then the result will be returned.  Let’s take our last query and change the AND to an OR, and look at how the results have changed.

SELECT 
     FirstName, LastName
FROM person.Contact
WHERE
     LastName = 'Skywalker'
     OR FirstName = 'Luke'

OUTPUT

FirstName  LastName
---------  ---------
Luke       Skywalker
Luke       Foster
Marvin     Skywalker

On my server, I got 133 results. This query returns every record in Person.Contact where the first name is Luke, no matter what the last name. It also shows you every record with Skywalker as the last name, no matter what the first name is. That’s what OR does. It returns results that match either criterion.

Combining AND With OR

I’d like to issue a word of caution.  When you need to combine AND with OR, please be aware of the order in which the comparisons will be made.  This is where I introduce parentheses into my queries.  Anyone remember “Please Excuse My Dear Aunt Sally”?

That can help you remember this: Anything in parentheses will be tested first.

When you start chaining together ANDs with ORs, you’re going to see results that you don’t expect to see.  In those cases really study the logic you’re sending to the SQL Parser.  Should two of them really be considered at the same time?

Let’s look at a contrived example.  Show me all the products that are yellow or green and cost less than a dollar.  You have to really consider that logic.  Do you want to see all items that are yellow and less than a dollar and all the items green and less than a dollar?  Or do you wish to see all items less than a dollar that are yellow or green?

SELECT 
	Name, color, ListPrice
FROM Production.product
WHERE
	color = 'yellow'
	OR color = 'green'
	and ListPrice < 1.00

OUTPUT

Name                    color   listprice
---------------------   ------  ---------
Road-550-W Yellow, 38	Yellow	1120.49
Road-550-W Yellow, 40	Yellow	1120.49
Road-550-W Yellow, 42	Yellow	1120.49

The lesson I want you to pick up here is that you have to look at your results and compare them to the logic you intend the server to follow.  If your results aren’t matching your intentions, look at the logic you’ve written.  You may need to wrap some of your criteron together, so the server understand you.

The server after all is just a machine, and it will do exactly what you tell it, even if you’re not entirely sure what you’re telling it to do.

Conclusion

Logical operators are a fundamental part of developing queries.  You’ll have to define your instructions to the server is ways the server thinks are unambiguous.  This can be a challenge, but with the proper training and patience, you can get the server to return the exact results you want every time.  If not, you can always update your query and hit F5 again!

As always, if you have any questions send them in!  I’m here to help.

Previous: SELECT, Filtering Results Next: Advanced LIKE clauses

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • A New File Interrogator
  • Using Generative AI in Data Engineering
  • Getting started with Microsoft Fabric
  • Docker-based Spark
  • Network Infrastructure Updates

Recent Comments

  1. slowder on Data Engineering for Databricks
  2. Alex Ott on Data Engineering for Databricks

Archives

  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • October 2018
  • August 2018
  • May 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • August 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • November 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • June 2002

Categories

  • Career Development
  • Data Engineering
  • Data Science
  • Infrastructure
  • Microsoft SQL
  • Modern Data Estate
  • Personal
  • Random Technology
  • uncategorized
© 2025 shannonlowder.com | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme