Skip to content

shannonlowder.com

Menu
  • About
  • Biml Interrogator Demo
  • Latest Posts
Menu

SQL 301 – Views

Posted on December 29, 2008February 9, 2011 by slowder

At this point I’m sure you know how to CREATE and ALTER a VIEW.  But today I’d like to go into a little more detail on views.  I’d like to cover updatable views,  and some additional options you can add to your CREATE or ALTER VIEW statements.

Updatable Views

You can write insert s, updates, and deletes against a view, as long as the following statements are true.

  • Any modifications, including UPDATE, INSERT, and DELETE statements, must reference columns from only one base table.  If you try to update two different base tables in a single statement, you’ll get an error: Msg 4405, Level 16, State 1, Line 2 View or function ‘viewName’ is not updatable because the modification affects multiple base tables. If you need to be able to update multiple base tables at once, You’ll have to create an INSTEAD OF trigger to cover that UPDATE, INSERT, or DELETE statement.  At that point though, you’re writing your own rules!
  • The column(s) you’re trying to update cannot be computed columns.  This means they cannot use AVG, COUNT, SUM, MIN, MAX, GROUPING, STDEV, STDEVP, VAR, VARP, UNION, UNION ALL, CROSS JOIN, EXCEPT, and INTERSECT will all be forbidden, if you want to do any updates without resorting to triggers.
  • You aren’t using GROUP BY, HAVING, or DISTINCT clauses.
  • You aren’t using TOP.

If any of the above aren’t true, you’ll have to use an INSTEAD OF trigger, or directly update the base tables.  Now that you understand updating the view, I’d like to introduce you to some options you can add to your view definition

WITH CHECK OPTION

CREATE VIEW viewName
AS
SELECT sampleCount FROM tableName WHERE sampleCount BETWEEN 1 and 100
WITH CHECK OPTION

This option forces the update (or insert) to check any criteria set through the SELECT statement and make sure the changes you make will still be visible through the VIEW after the change is made.  In the above example, if I ran an update against the view and tried to change the sampleCount to a value outside of 1 top 100, you’d get the following error: Msg 550, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 The attempted insert or update failed because the target view either specifies WITH CHECK OPTION or spans a view that specifies WITH CHECK OPTION and one or more rows resulting from the operation did not qualify under the CHECK OPTION constraint.  The statement has been terminated. This becomes useful when you want to limit users ability to make changes, but you can’t completely lock them out of a table.

You could define a view that limits the user to a specific subset of a table.  If they try to change the data so it goes outside of that subset, the WITH CHECK OPTION could prevent that!

I would like to point out now, ny updates performed directly to a view’s underlying tables are not verified against the view, even if CHECK OPTION is specified.  So, if you didn’t lock the user out of the base table, they could go around your protection, and make the change anyway.

WITH ENCRYPTION

Honestly, I’m not sure why this really matters, but the body of your view is stored in sys.syscomments.  If you want to encrypt that, and prevent it from being published for replication… pass WITH ENCRYPTION on your create statement.  Check out the following code.

CREATE VIEW viewName
WITH ENCRYPTION
AS
SELECT columnName FROM tableName

WITH SCHEMABINDING

Finally, I’d like to cover SCHEMABINDING for your views.  This is useful for making changes to your tables impossible without first making changes to your view.  This is useful when you have several programmers working in one database.  I know I’ve run into problems with a view that was built on a table that got changed under me, and I didn’t know about it until a user reported an error.

WITH SCHEMABINDING can prevent that.  If a user tries to make a change to a base table that would affect the VIEW, you first have to drop the VIEW, or alter the view so the change will no longer affect it.  Or you can alter the view to remove the SCHEMABINDING temporarily.

There is a catch…When you use SCHEMABINDING, the select_statement must include the two-part names (schema.object) of tables, views, or user-defined functions that are referenced.

That’s all for today…you’ll need some time to digest this.  If you have any questions, let me know.  I’m here to help!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • A New File Interrogator
  • Using Generative AI in Data Engineering
  • Getting started with Microsoft Fabric
  • Docker-based Spark
  • Network Infrastructure Updates

Recent Comments

  1. slowder on Data Engineering for Databricks
  2. Alex Ott on Data Engineering for Databricks

Archives

  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • October 2018
  • August 2018
  • May 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • August 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • November 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • June 2002

Categories

  • Career Development
  • Data Engineering
  • Data Science
  • Infrastructure
  • Microsoft SQL
  • Modern Data Estate
  • Personal
  • Random Technology
  • uncategorized
© 2025 shannonlowder.com | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme