Skip to content

shannonlowder.com

Menu
  • About
  • Biml Interrogator Demo
  • Latest Posts
Menu

Product Review: DTS xChange

Posted on December 29, 2010December 29, 2010 by slowder

Late last week I was informed our new servers would be available January 3, and I should be ready to set up my new SQL 2008R2 two-node cluster.   I can’t begin to tell you how excited I am about this project!  I’d already downloaded the latest backups for my databases, and restored them to my 2008R2 Development environment.

Not only was it coal, but it was ANGRY coal!
Not only was it coal, but it was ANGRY coal!

As expected, all of them restored without a hitch.  I’d already checked out the Profiler trace looking for deprecated features being used in my databases, and I found none of any significance.  I started porting over the jobs and SSIS packages to my development environment.  That’s when I received a late Christmas present.

I found that I had thirteen SSIS packages that were just wrappers for DTS packages.

Awesome!  Just what I wanted (doing my best to keep sarcasm out of my voice…and failing miserably)!

So I had to dig into DTS.  But I had no instance of SQL 2000 running.  That’s when I found Pragmatic Works DTS xChange.  It promised nearly hands free conversion for my DTS packages into SSIS.  It would even create SSIS 2008 packages.

I had to give it a go.  I like the fact that they set up their software for the whole project of converting DTS packages to SSIS.  It would have been easy to jump straight into the actual conversion process.  They have a calculator that can help you justify the cost of the software by computing the cost of converting the DTS package by hand.

It appeared that if I converted more than 3 packages, the software would show a positive return on investment.

Next, the actual conversion.  You could apply rules to the conversion. You can tie into a central auditing framework, a central logging location (either on the SQL server in a table, or to .log files).  All of this would have been wonderful, if my packages had been constructed in a logical manner.

Rather than using config files to control sources and destinations, the original designers use ActiveX controls to set and retrieve those settings.

Rather than auditing to one table, or even one database, most ignored auditing, and the rest each had unique logging/auditing methods.

None of the files were processed from a single location (or even the same source machine).

None of them agreed on how to handle errors.

None of them agreed on how to archive the files after processing.  You couldn’t even pass in the archive location via config file.

Based on my findings, I’m going to have to push for a complete redesign from scratch.  In the mean time, I will be able to use my current SSIS wrappers for the DTS packages in production.  But I will have to move relatively quickly to upgrade these packages.  I highly suggest you try out this software before you jump straight into the conversion process, at the very least, use it to see where you are, and where you need to go.
For now, I’m going to throw myself into setting up a central auditing location for my processes, and build these packages on paper…then I’ll get into the conversion.  Luckily Pragmatic Works gave me a heads up on this process!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • A New File Interrogator
  • Using Generative AI in Data Engineering
  • Getting started with Microsoft Fabric
  • Docker-based Spark
  • Network Infrastructure Updates

Recent Comments

  1. slowder on Data Engineering for Databricks
  2. Alex Ott on Data Engineering for Databricks

Archives

  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • October 2018
  • August 2018
  • May 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • August 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • November 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • June 2002

Categories

  • Career Development
  • Data Engineering
  • Data Science
  • Infrastructure
  • Microsoft SQL
  • Modern Data Estate
  • Personal
  • Random Technology
  • uncategorized
© 2025 shannonlowder.com | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme