Skip to content

shannonlowder.com

Menu
  • About
  • Biml Interrogator Demo
  • Latest Posts
Menu

SQL 301-FOR XML AUTO

Posted on February 14, 2011July 6, 2011 by slowder

In my previous XML article, I covered FOR XML RAW.  It’s useful, if limited.  This time I’d like to cover XML AUTO.  It’s still limited, but if you’re looking to model simply hierarchical data, AUTO may be the option for you.  If you’re looking for more details, I’d suggest checking out the books online article here.

We’re still going to use the Adventureworks database in my SQL 2008R2 instance, but we’re going to work with a new query.  This one shows us a simple hierarchical relationship between Customers, and their orders.

SELECT 
   customer.CustomerID, 
   OrderHeader.CustomerID,
   OrderHeader.SalesOrderID, 
   OrderHeader.Status,
   customer.CustomerType
FROM Sales.Customer customer
INNER JOIN Sales.SalesOrderHeader OrderHeader
   ON customer.CustomerID = OrderHeader.CustomerID
WHERE
   customer.CustomerID in (1,2)
ORDER BY 
   customer.CustomerID
FOR XML AUTO
--Once you click the link in ssms, you will see:
<customer CustomerID="1" CustomerType="S">
 <OrderHeader CustomerID="1" SalesOrderID="43860" Status="5" />
 <OrderHeader CustomerID="1" SalesOrderID="44501" Status="5" />
 <OrderHeader CustomerID="1" SalesOrderID="45283" Status="5" />
 <OrderHeader CustomerID="1" SalesOrderID="46042" Status="5" />
</customer>
<customer CustomerID="2" CustomerType="S">
 <OrderHeader CustomerID="2" SalesOrderID="46976" Status="5" />
 <OrderHeader CustomerID="2" SalesOrderID="47997" Status="5" />
 <OrderHeader CustomerID="2" SalesOrderID="49054" Status="5" />
 <OrderHeader CustomerID="2" SalesOrderID="50216" Status="5" />
 <OrderHeader CustomerID="2" SalesOrderID="51728" Status="5" />
 <OrderHeader CustomerID="2" SalesOrderID="57044" Status="5" />
 <OrderHeader CustomerID="2" SalesOrderID="63198" Status="5" />
 <OrderHeader CustomerID="2" SalesOrderID="69488" Status="5" />
</customer>

Study the results.  You will find that each table that has at least one column in the FROM clause has been returned as an element in the XML.  In our case it used the aliases, customer and OrderHeader.

The values we asked for in our select clause have become attributes.  We asked for customerID and CustomerType from the customer table, so both of our customer elements have  the attributes customerID and CustomerType.  We also asked for the customerID, SalesOrderID, and Status from the OrderHeader table, so OrderHeader has those attributes.

Now, just like when we use XML RAW, if we want to change the attributes to elements, all we do is add ELEMENTS to our query.

SELECT 
   customer.CustomerID, 
   OrderHeader.CustomerID,
   OrderHeader.SalesOrderID, 
   OrderHeader.Status,
   customer.CustomerType
FROM Sales.Customer customer
INNER JOIN Sales.SalesOrderHeader OrderHeader
   ON customer.CustomerID = OrderHeader.CustomerID
WHERE
   customer.CustomerID in (1,2)
ORDER BY 
   customer.CustomerID
FOR XML AUTO, ELEMENTS
--I'm only going to show the results for CustomerID 1
--since this xml is much bigger.
<customer>
  <CustomerID>1</CustomerID>
  <CustomerType>S</CustomerType>
  <OrderHeader>
    <CustomerID>1</CustomerID>
    <SalesOrderID>43860</SalesOrderID>
    <Status>5</Status>
 </OrderHeader>
 <OrderHeader>
    <CustomerID>1</CustomerID>
    <SalesOrderID>44501</SalesOrderID>
    <Status>5</Status>
 </OrderHeader>
 <OrderHeader>
    <CustomerID>1</CustomerID>
    <SalesOrderID>45283</SalesOrderID>
    <Status>5</Status>
 </OrderHeader>
    <OrderHeader>
    <CustomerID>1</CustomerID>
    <SalesOrderID>46042</SalesOrderID>
    <Status>5</Status>
 </OrderHeader>
</customer> 

The way the XML is constructed is based on the order of the tables in the SELECT clause.  In our case, the customer.CustomerID column was the first column in our SELECT clause, as a result, it’s the first element listed.  While the next item in my select is from the OrderHeader table, those are skipped until the CustomerType column is included, since it’s part of the customer table, and that was the first table listed in our SELECT.

After the first table listed has been processed, it goes to the second table listed, and so on, until all columns are included in the resulting xml, by order of tables aliased.

You can still add the ROOT(‘name’) keyword to your query if you want to wrap your results into a single element.

also, like XML RAW, if you want to include binary data, don’t forget the BINARY BASE64 option.

When using XML AUTO, you’re not going to have a great deal of flexibility in the structure of your XML, at least not without rewriting the query.  For more Flexibility you’ll want to look into XML PATH or XML EXPLICIT.

Play around with some queries and XML AUTO.  Try and break it.  Learning where the exceptions are will help you identify when you should and when you shouldn’t use XML AUTO.

If you have any questions, send them in… I’m here to help you learn more about SQL!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • A New File Interrogator
  • Using Generative AI in Data Engineering
  • Getting started with Microsoft Fabric
  • Docker-based Spark
  • Network Infrastructure Updates

Recent Comments

  1. slowder on Data Engineering for Databricks
  2. Alex Ott on Data Engineering for Databricks

Archives

  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • October 2018
  • August 2018
  • May 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • August 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • November 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • June 2002

Categories

  • Career Development
  • Data Engineering
  • Data Science
  • Infrastructure
  • Microsoft SQL
  • Modern Data Estate
  • Personal
  • Random Technology
  • uncategorized
© 2025 shannonlowder.com | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme