Skip to content

shannonlowder.com

Menu
  • About
  • Biml Interrogator Demo
  • Latest Posts
Menu

Why I Went with SQL Sentry

Posted on August 30, 2011 by slowder

In my SQL Saturday #80 Session I spoke about how to get started as a DBA. One of the greatest advantages you can have as a DBA is setting up a fully featured monitoring solution. I mentioned three different solutions: Redgate Monitor, Confio Ignite, and SQL Sentry Power Suite.

I mentioned the pros and cons of the three solutions, and mentioned that I had chosen to go with SQL Sentry. I wanted to give a little more detail on why I made that call.

Images courtesy SQL SentryAll three have some form of performance monitoring. But when I opened the Performance Dashboard on my server for the first time, I was blown away by what I saw. In one screen I could see:

  • CPU utilization that was happening right then
  • Waits that were happening right then
  • I/O for both reads and writes that where happening right then

The amount of information at first just floored me. To be honest, it still intimidates some of my business users when they look over my shoulder. But seeing what’s happening right now is only useful some of the time. I can also go back in time and see what the usage was at any point in time after installing the monitoring solution.

I can also change tabs and pull up an image of how data is moving about my system. This has helped me point out when I need to move data files to separate LUNs in order to maximize read and write speed and eliminate contention for I/O resources between databases.
 

 

But the performance advisor isn’t the biggest reason I went with SQL Sentry. It was the Event Manager. It’s a calendar of all the events that are happening, and have happened on my SQL Server. With it, I can see:

  • Deadlocks and when they occurred.
  • Jobs when they run, when they fail, and when they run long.
  • I can see when Queries are consuming a lot of resources

Being able to see what was happening on a server at the time of a deadlock can help figure out how to resolve the deadlock. Let’s say you’ve scheduled a very large ETL Import process to run at the same time you have an even larger ETL export, guess what… they’re going to clobber each other. If you schedule the export to begin after the import has completed, you’ve just fixed the deadlock’s root cause!

This calendar of events is the number one reason I went with SQL Sentry. But before I let you go, there’s one more reason to go with SQL Sentry. SQL Sentry Plan Explorer integrates with the Event Manager.

When you see top SQL events happening on your server. Double click on the event. It’ll load that query into Plan Explorer, and you can really dig into why that query is so costly. You can even break down your cost to just I/O, or just CPU, depending on what you want to optimize for. You can also sort the operations by that cost in a table view, rather than having to drag around a graphic of your query.

Each one of these products on its own are great, but when you put them all together, it’s beyond awesome. It let’s you do more than just react to problems on your SQL Server, it let’s you get ahead of them. You’ll see problems before your users. And when you can get to that point, you job is completely different. It’s almost easy.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • A New File Interrogator
  • Using Generative AI in Data Engineering
  • Getting started with Microsoft Fabric
  • Docker-based Spark
  • Network Infrastructure Updates

Recent Comments

  1. slowder on Data Engineering for Databricks
  2. Alex Ott on Data Engineering for Databricks

Archives

  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • October 2018
  • August 2018
  • May 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • August 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • November 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • June 2002

Categories

  • Career Development
  • Data Engineering
  • Data Science
  • Infrastructure
  • Microsoft SQL
  • Modern Data Estate
  • Personal
  • Random Technology
  • uncategorized
© 2025 shannonlowder.com | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme