Skip to content

shannonlowder.com

Menu
  • About
  • Biml Interrogator Demo
  • Latest Posts
Menu

De-duping by CTE

Posted on January 18, 2012 by slowder

Ok, today we wrap up our design patterns for removing duplicates from tables by turning to common table expressions (CTE’s). When I start talking CTE’s some people begin to cringe in fear. I’ll admit, I still have to refer to a reference when doing something I haven’t done before with a CTE, which is pretty much de-duping and building hierarchical lists. But they’re useful, and they can have a light load on your SQL server in some situations, and de-duping is one of those situations, so let’s dive right in!

First we’re going to make sure we have our troubled table exists. If you don’t have it, grab my script here to create it. Then take a look at the duplicates you have.

SELECT email, COUNT(*)
FROM TroubledTable
GROUP BY email
HAVING COUNT(*) > 1

We’re going to look at a email address that’s been duplicated in our table.

SELECT * 
FROM troubledtable
WHERE email = 'eget.odio.Aliquam@enimnec.ca'

I’m looking at 7 copies of that email address. Now we’re going to create a CTE that gives every copy of an email address a distinct row number. Then we can use that row number to identify the “extra” copies, in our case any record that has a row number greater than 1.

Let’s first look at the query that gives us the row numbers for each copy.

SELECT 
	ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY firstname, lastname, email ORDER BY ( SELECT 0)) RN
	, Firstname, lastname, email
FROM   troubledtable
WHERE email = 'eget.odio.Aliquam@enimnec.ca' 

--RESULTS:
/*
RN  Firstname lastname  email
--- --------- --------- ----------------------------- 
1   Abra      Romero    eget.odio.Aliquam@enimnec.ca
2   Abra      Romero    eget.odio.Aliquam@enimnec.ca
3   Abra      Romero    eget.odio.Aliquam@enimnec.ca
4   Abra      Romero    eget.odio.Aliquam@enimnec.ca
5   Abra      Romero    eget.odio.Aliquam@enimnec.ca
6   Abra      Romero    eget.odio.Aliquam@enimnec.ca
7   Abra      Romero    eget.odio.Aliquam@enimnec.ca
8   Abra      Romero    eget.odio.Aliquam@enimnec.ca
*/

Now, if we define that query as our CTE we can add another where clause that will show us only the “extra” rows. Please notice I start with the semi-colon. Do that, so the interpreter will understand your query. If you miss it, the interpreter might try to include a previous query, and that just won’t work.

;WITH cte AS (
	SELECT 
		ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY firstname, lastname, email ORDER BY ( SELECT 0)) RN
		, Firstname, lastname, email
    FROM   troubledtable
    WHERE email = 'eget.odio.Aliquam@enimnec.ca'  
)
SELECT * 
FROM cte
WHERE  
	RN > 1 
--RESULTS:
/*
RN  Firstname lastname  email
--- --------- --------- ----------------------------- 
2   Abra      Romero    eget.odio.Aliquam@enimnec.ca
3   Abra      Romero    eget.odio.Aliquam@enimnec.ca
4   Abra      Romero    eget.odio.Aliquam@enimnec.ca
5   Abra      Romero    eget.odio.Aliquam@enimnec.ca
6   Abra      Romero    eget.odio.Aliquam@enimnec.ca
7   Abra      Romero    eget.odio.Aliquam@enimnec.ca
8   Abra      Romero    eget.odio.Aliquam@enimnec.ca
*/

Those are the records we want to delete. So if we change our SELECT from CTE to A DELETE from the CTE, we’re good to go!

;WITH cte AS (
	SELECT 
		ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY firstname, lastname, email ORDER BY ( SELECT 0)) RN
		, Firstname, lastname, email
    FROM   troubledtable
    WHERE
		email = 'eget.odio.Aliquam@enimnec.ca'	
)
DELETE 
FROM cte
WHERE  
	RN > 1 
--(7 row(s) Affected)

Here’s the really cool part of using a CTE, the delete was actually performed against the base table. Check out the execution plan for the proof!

SELECT email, COUNT(*)
FROM TroubledTable
WHERE email = 'eget.odio.Aliquam@enimnec.ca'
GROUP BY email
HAVING COUNT(*) > 1
--(0 row(s) affected)

Pretty awesome, right?
Now, let’s remove the where clause and de-dupe the whole table.

;WITH cte AS (
	SELECT 
		ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY firstname, lastname, email ORDER BY ( SELECT 0)) RN
		--, Firstname, lastname, email -- not needed for the delete, just to show the data.
    FROM   troubledtable)
DELETE 
FROM cte
WHERE  
	RN > 1
--see they're all gone:
SELECT email, COUNT(*)
FROM TroubledTable
GROUP BY email
HAVING COUNT(*) > 1

Using CTE’s to remove dupes can be a pretty cool way of doing the job. If you’re only removing a small percentage of the rows in your table, the CTE can actually reduce your locking from a table lock to a page or row lock.

As with everything, you need to choose the method that works best for your situation. You’ll have to make the judgement call on when each solution will work best for you.

That’s it for the design patterns for removing duplicates. Next time we’re going to cover a way of preventing duplicates from being inserted in the first place by performing upserts, instead of just inserting new data!

Until then, if you have any questions, please let me know! I’m here to help.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • A New File Interrogator
  • Using Generative AI in Data Engineering
  • Getting started with Microsoft Fabric
  • Docker-based Spark
  • Network Infrastructure Updates

Recent Comments

  1. slowder on Data Engineering for Databricks
  2. Alex Ott on Data Engineering for Databricks

Archives

  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • October 2018
  • August 2018
  • May 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • August 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • November 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • June 2002

Categories

  • Career Development
  • Data Engineering
  • Data Science
  • Infrastructure
  • Microsoft SQL
  • Modern Data Estate
  • Personal
  • Random Technology
  • uncategorized
© 2025 shannonlowder.com | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme